ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2025
A new risk-stratified scoring system for predicting left atrial appendage thrombus in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.
Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe predictive capacity of the CHA2DS2-VASc score for left atrial appendage thrombus (LAAT) detection in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients shows significant limitations.
objectiveTo recognize predictors of LAAT and create a more precise risk-assessment model.
methodsBetween January 2019 and December 2023, consecutive NVAF patients without a previous history of anticoagulation who underwent transesophageal echocardiography were recruited from two centers. Clinical data, biomarker information, and transthoracic echocardiographic parameters were collected in a standardized manner. The derivation cohort comprised patients from one center, while the validation cohort consisted of participants from the other center.
results1505 patients (mean age 63.4±9.77 years; 895 male) were analyzed. LAAT was detected in 109 (7.24%) of the total 1505 patients. The final parameters selected for the LEFT-AF risk model included left atrial diameter (LAD), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), history of heart failure (HF), history of stroke, and non-paroxysmal AF (NPAF). In the derivation cohort, the novel scoring system demonstrated superior discriminative performance compared to the currently used CHA2DS2-VASc score (0.693, 95% CI 0.634-0.752) (P<0.001), CHA2DS2 score (0.679, 95% CI 0.621-0.731) (P<0.001) and CLOTS-AF score (Creatinine>1.5mg/dL, LVEF<50%, LAVI>34ml/m2, TAPSE<17mm, Stroke, AF rhythm) (0.762, 95% CI 0.704-0.821), with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.855 (95% CI 0.808-0.902) (P<0.001). This same superior performance was maintained in the validation cohort.
conclusionAmong patients with NVAF who had not previously received anticoagulation therapy, the prevalence of LAAT was 7.24%. The LEFT-AF score improves LAAT risk stratification, particularly in patients with low CHA2DS2-VASc scores, potentially guiding anticoagulation decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.