ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
Leveraging laboratory biomarkers to predict urosepsis after upper urinary tract stone surgery: an explainable machine learning approach.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveUrosepsis is a leading cause of perioperative mortality after upper urinary tract stone surgery. This study aimed to develop a simple and accurate predictive model for postoperative sepsis by integrating laboratory parameters using machine learning (ML) and the Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) algorithm.
methodsData from 7,464 patients were analyzed, including 155 pre- and postoperative features. Key variables were selected using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression and correlation analysis. Eight ML algorithms were employed to develop the predictive model using 10-fold cross-validation. The model’s performance was assessed using Receiver Operating Characteristic curve, learning curve, calibration plot, and decision curve. The SHAP algorithm was employed to analyze variable importance. Finally, the model was converted into a publicly accessible application.
results116 out of 155 variables (74.84%) differed significantly between the urosepsis (n = 622, 8.33%) and non-urosepsis groups (n = 6,842, 91.67%). LASSO regression identified eight predictive variables: postoperative IL-6, SAA, PCT/ALB, NLPR, PT, ALB, HCT, and neutrophil. Light Gradient Boosting Machine achieved the best performance, with AUCs of 1.0, 0.90, and 0.88 for the training, validation, and test cohorts, respectively. A good model fit, strong calibration, and positive clinical utility were confirmed by the learning curve, calibration plot, and decision curve. Postoperative PCT/ALB, neutrophil, IL-6, ALB, and PT were identified as key predictors by the SHAP algorithm. A publicly accessible web application was developed to facilitate both patients and physicians (https://www.xsmartanalysis.com/model/list/predict/model/html?mid=29648&symbol=71lphm763138mj895nd8).
conclusionsA robust, interpretable model based on postoperative laboratory biomarkers was successfully developed and validated. This model exhibits excellent predictive performance and clinical utility, and the integration of SHAP analysis provides transparent insights into the key drivers of urosepsis, offering a practical tool for early risk stratification and personalized intervention in clinical practice.
trial registrationProspective registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (trial registration number: ChiCTR2400079409, date of registration: 2024-01-03). CLINICAL
trial registrationThis study was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on January 3, 2024 (ChiCTR2400079409, http://www.chictr.org.cn/ ).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.