Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41422075›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Kinetochore mutations and histone phosphorylation pattern changes accompany holo- and macro-monocentromere evolution.

Yi-Tzu Kuo, Pavel Neumann, Jianyong Chen, Jörg Fuchs, Veit Schubert, Katrin Kumke, Mariela Analia Sader, Michael Melzer, Zihao Zhu, Axel Himmelbach and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Chromosome painting in plants: history and future perspectives.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Yi-Tzu KuoLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK) Gatersleben, Corrensstrasse 3, Seeland, Germany. kuo@ipk-gatersleben.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5893-3784
Pavel NeumannBiology Centre, Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Plant Molecular Biology, Branišovská 31, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6711-6639
Jianyong ChenLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK) Gatersleben, Corrensstrasse 3, Seeland, Germany.
Jörg FuchsLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK) Gatersleben, Corrensstrasse 3, Seeland, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4171-5371
Veit SchubertLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK) Gatersleben, Corrensstrasse 3, Seeland, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3072-0485
Katrin KumkeLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK) Gatersleben, Corrensstrasse 3, Seeland, Germany.
Mariela Analia SaderLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK) Gatersleben, Corrensstrasse 3, Seeland, Germany.
Michael MelzerLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK) Gatersleben, Corrensstrasse 3, Seeland, Germany.
Zihao ZhuLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK) Gatersleben, Corrensstrasse 3, Seeland, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2296-2724
Axel HimmelbachLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK) Gatersleben, Corrensstrasse 3, Seeland, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7338-0946
Heiko HentrichMolecular Cell Biology, Joseph Gottlieb Kölreuter Institute for Plant Sciences (JKIP), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Fritz-Haber-Weg 4, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Jiří MacasBiology Centre, Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Plant Molecular Biology, Branišovská 31, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0829-1570
Andreas HoubenLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK) Gatersleben, Corrensstrasse 3, Seeland, Germany. houben@ipk-gatersleben.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3419-239X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Centromeres are essential for kinetochore assembly and spindle attachment. While chromosomes of most species are monocentric with a single centromere, a minority exhibit holocentricity, with a centromere along the chromatid length. Sporadic emergence of holocentricity suggests multiple independent transitions. To explore this, we compare the centromere and (epi)genome organization of two sister genera with contrasting centromere types: Chamaelirium luteum with large macro-monocentromeres and Chionographis japonica with holocentromeres. Both exhibit chromosome-wide histone phosphorylation patterns distinct from typical monocentric species. Kinetochore analysis reveals similar chimeric Borealin in both species, with additional KNL2 loss and NSL1 chimerism in Cha. luteum. The broad-scale synteny between both genomes supports de novo holocentromere formation in Chi. japonica. Despite sharing features with both centromere types, macro-monocentromeres do not represent a direct link between mono- and holocentromeres. We propose a model for the divergent evolution involving kinetochore gene mutations, altered histone phosphorylation patterns, and centromeric satellite DNA amplification.

Indexed as

CentromereEvolution, MolecularHistonesKinetochoresMutationPhosphorylationHistones

Identifiers

PMID41422075
PMCPMC12722358

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.