SynthesisBMC infectious diseases2025
Unveiling the underestimated prevalence of HIV, HBV and TB triple infection in Asia, South America, and Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is a genus of retroviruses that targets immune cells and may eventually cause immune-deficiency illness. Triple infection of HIV/hepatitis B virus (HBV) /tuberculosis (TB) leads to a worse prognosis than mono-infection. We aimed to unveil the pooled estimation of HIV/HBV/TB co-infection prevalence in Asia, South America, and Africa.
methodsA systematic literature search in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was performed for studies of the prevalence of HIV/HBV/TB triple infection published from January 1, 1990, to March 31, 2024. The Freeman–Tukey random effects model was used to calculate the pooled prevalence.
resultsWe included 7 studies with in total 6401 participants and 259 triple infection cases. The pooled triple infection rate in the enrolled population was 4.4% (259/6401; 95% CI 2.2%-7.3%). The results of the subgroup analysis showed that the prevalence of triple infection was significantly higher in the South America (82/950, 8.6%; 95% CI 6.8%-10.4%), in men (86/1817, 3.4%; 95% CI 0.7%-7.8%) and patients receiving antiretroviral treatment (125/1611, 7.4%; 95% CI 5.8%–9.2%). However, no significant difference in the triple infection rate was observed among individuals initially diagnosed with HIV or TB.
conclusionsThis meta-analysis suggests that the prevalence of HIV/HBV/TB triple infection in the regions studied is underestimated, and we should focus more effort on improving novel strategies for identifying triple infection of HIV/HBV/TB. However, additional studies are required to be incorporated in future analyses to provide a pooled estimate of the global pooled prevalence. CLINICAL TRIAL: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.