Evidence mapPaperPMID 41422192Full record

ReviewDiscover oncology2025

Targeting cancer stem cell plasticity and tumor microenvironment crosstalk: a comprehensive review.

Mutaz Jamal Al-Khreisat, Waleed K Abdulsahib, Ihsan Khudhair Jasim, H Malathi, Priya Priyadarshini Nayak, D Alex Anand, Gunjan Mukherjee, Aashna Sinha, Oybek Ruziyev

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Targeting tumor transition windows.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mutaz Jamal Al-KhreisatFaculty of Allied Medical Sciences, Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan.
Waleed K AbdulsahibDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, Al Farahidi University, Baghdad, Iraq. waleedk.abdulsahib@uoalfarahidi.edu.iq.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8851-5783
Ihsan Khudhair JasimDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Al-Turath University, Baghdad, Iraq.
H MalathiDepartment of Biotechnology and Genetics, School of Sciences, JAIN (Deemed to be University), Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Priya Priyadarshini NayakDepartment of Medical Oncology, IMS and SUM Hospital, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, 751003, India.
D Alex AnandDepartment of Biomedical, Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Gunjan MukherjeeUniversity Institute of Biotechnology, Chandigarh University, Mohali, Punjab, India.
Aashna SinhaSchool of Applied and Life Sciences, Division of Research and Innovation, Uttaranchal University, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
Oybek RuziyevDepartment of Medical Fundamental Sciences, Termez University of Economics and Service, Termez, Uzbekistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer remains a major global health challenge, marked by profound heterogeneity and adaptability that frequently limit the success of conventional and targeted therapies. Among the diverse cellular populations within tumors, cancer stem cells (CSCs) have emerged as key drivers of initiation, progression, metastasis, and therapeutic resistance. Sharing core features with normal stem cells, including self-renewal and multipotency, CSCs sustain tumor growth and contribute to intratumoral heterogeneity. Importantly, the traditional hierarchical model has been revised with the recognition of CSC plasticity—the dynamic ability of cells to transition between CSC and non-CSC states or among distinct CSC subsets. This phenotypic flexibility, governed by intrinsic genetic and epigenetic mechanisms and strongly influenced by extrinsic cues from the tumor microenvironment (TME), underpins therapeutic resistance, immune evasion, and disease recurrence. The TME represents a complex, dynamic ecosystem composed of stromal cells, immune populations, extracellular matrix components, and soluble factors. Far from a passive scaffold, the TME actively engages in reciprocal crosstalk with CSCs, sustaining stemness, modulating plasticity, and shaping tumor progression. This bidirectional interplay reinforces CSC survival, fuels metastatic potential, and contributes to therapeutic failure. A comprehensive understanding of CSC plasticity and CSC–TME interactions is therefore essential for the design of durable therapeutic strategies. This review synthesizes current knowledge of the molecular and cellular mechanisms driving CSC plasticity and their microenvironmental regulation. It further evaluates emerging approaches—including small molecules, epigenetic modulators, and TME-normalizing therapies—that target these processes, and discusses challenges and future directions for translating these strategies into precision oncology.

Indexed as

Cancer stem cellsPlasticityPrecision oncologyTherapeutic resistanceTumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID41422192
PMCPMC12834896

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.