ArticleArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2025
Coordinated care program in the Polish primary healthcare: insights into the early implementation.
Article in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Coordinated Care Program (CCP) was introduced in Polish Primary Healthcare (PHC) in October 2022. It promised a significant transformation in the country’s PHC system by integrating extended diagnostics and chronic disease management to enhance patient access to PHC and improve healthcare outcomes. Longitudinal analysis of their funding and service capacity to equitably address the patient needs and satisfaction is crucial in assessing whether CCP maintains its promises and value over time. The study outlines the results of the CCP outcomes two years after its implementation, by examining the PHC facilities’ participation rates in CCP, patient coverage, as well as patient satisfaction within the existing regulatory and funding framework.
methodsFollowing the principles of the Theory-Based Evaluation, the effects were assessed using a mixed-methods approach that includes a specially designed stakeholder survey, a desk research of the regulatory framework, and a secondary analysis of a nationwide patient satisfaction survey.
resultsSince its implementation, with a total of 640 million Polish Zloty allocated through steady monthly growth funding, there has been a consistent increase in the PHC’s adoption of the CCP across sixteen regions. By the end of 2024, 41% of the total 6053 PHC facilities were participating in the CCP. Eight regions outperformed the national average in expanding their diagnostic and therapeutic capabilities to meet patients’ needs in diabetology, cardiology, endocrinology, pulmonology, and nephrology. They achieved a very high level of patient satisfaction with the CCP (The overall Net Promoter Score was 75.46 (-100 to 100 range).
conclusionTo sustain the CCP program’s successes, it is necessary to reduce regional disparities in CCP accessibility, particularly in rural or economically disadvantaged areas. Follow-up assessment of whether the CCP efficiently met its objectives should consider the diverse needs of all patients involved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.