ArticleScientific reports2025
Interpretable machine learning based on the Charlson comorbidity index predicts 28-day mortality in acute hypercapnic respiratory failure.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Network Analysis-Driven Machine Learning Model for Identifying High-Cost Stroke Inpatients Using Hospital Discharge Data: Retrospective Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acute hypercapnic respiratory failure (AHRF) is a major cause of mortality in intensive care units (ICUs). Early identification of high-risk patients with poor prognosis is crucial, as timely and effective interventions can significantly improve survival rates. However, effective models for predicting short-term mortality in AHRF patients remain limited. This study extracted clinical data from 4,302 AHRF patients in the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database (version 3.1), with 28-day all-cause mortality as the primary outcome. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, along with the Boruta algorithm and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, consistently revealed a significant association between the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and 28-day mortality. Even after propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to balance the baseline characteristics between the high and low CCI groups, the difference in 28-day mortality remained statistically significant. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis demonstrated an U-shaped relationship between CCI and the 28-day survival probability, indicating that higher CCI values were associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes. Compared to the low-CCI group, patients in the high-CCI group exhibited a significantly elevated risk of 28-day mortality (P = 0.004). Subgroup analyses further suggested that the predictive value of CCI was more pronounced among patients with chronic pulmonary disease and those with a partial pressure of arterial oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO₂/FiO₂) ratio between 100 and 149, compared to patients with a ratio > 150 or < 100. Feature selection using the Boruta algorithm identified CCI as a key variable with a high Z-score. Among the developed machine learning models, the Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) algorithm achieved the best overall performance (internal validation results accuracy = 0.7793 [0.7516, 0.8070], area under the curve [AUC] = 0.8158 [0.7595, 0.8721]; external validation results on the eICU Collaborative Research Database (eICU-CRD): accuracy = 0.8003 [0.7860–0.8147], AUC = 0.7629 [0.7213–0.8045]), underscoring its robustness in predicting 28-day mortality in AHRF patients. Moreover, the Acute Physiology Score III (APSIII) also demonstrated potential predictive value for adverse clinical outcomes in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.