ArticleMikrochimica acta2025
Smartphone-based video deep learning enables rapid and accurate lateral flow diagnostics.
Article in Mikrochimica acta, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lateral flow assays (LFAs) are widely used in point-of-care diagnostics due to their simplicity, portability, and rapid results. Despite their advantages, LFAs face challenges in terms of sensitivity and quantitative accuracy, particularly when relying on static end-point measurements, which capture a single time point rather than dynamic changes throughout the assay. In this study, we introduce a new approach to enhance LFA performance by integrating temporal video data and deep learning algorithms. We compare the diagnostic accuracy of static image-based analysis and video-based analysis using a smartphone-based system for human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) detection. Temporal video data, captured in three distinct time segments (1–4, 4–7, and 7–10 min after the reaction starts), were processed using a YOLOv8-based deep learning model, which improved diagnostic performance compared to static images. The video-based method achieved a sensitivity of 92.7%, specificity of 99.1%, and overall accuracy of 98.4% within the 1–4 min time segment, surpassing the static image method (87.3%, 98.4%, and 97.2%, respectively). Moreover, the video approach facilitated faster results, with accurate detection in just 4 min, compared to 15 min used in traditional methods. These findings demonstrate that incorporating temporal video sequences into deep learning models can enhance the sensitivity, specificity, and speed of LFA-based diagnostics, offering a promising strategy for improving point-of-care testing. This approach holds potential for broader applications in clinical diagnostics, enabling faster and more accurate biomarker detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41423536What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.