ArticleScientific reports2025
Obesity prediction using an explainable deep learning framework based on LSTM-LIME with integrated visualization.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in Nutrition Research: Analytical Methods, Applications, and Key Considerations.The Journal of nutrition · 2026Review
- From explainability to clinical actionability: translating artificial intelligence models into decision support for endocrine disease management.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Obesity is a major global health challenge requiring accurate and interpretable risk-assessment models to support early detection and prevention strategies. This study introduces a novel explainable deep learning framework for multiclass obesity prediction using a Saudi-specific dataset that integrates anthropometric, lifestyle, and dietary factors. Six models were evaluated including Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Bidirectional LSTM, Recurrent Neural Network (RNN), Deep Neural Network (DNN) specifically Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), TabNet, and Autoencoder. The Bi-LSTM model, with 96% accuracy, a macro recall of 0.96, a macro F1-score of 0.95, surpassed the other models in terms of predictive performance. Regression-style metrics such as the Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and the Coefficient of Determination ([Formula: see text]) were also applied to assess ordinal misclassification and model calibration. The novelty of this work lies in the development of the first culturally specific Saudi multiclass obesity dataset and the integration of LSTM networks with Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME) within an interactive interface, enabling both predictive accuracy and transparent, user-centered visualization of obesity-risk factors. This approach advances current practice by combining explainable deep learning with region-specific health data for precision public-health applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.