ArticlePalliative & supportive care2025
Discordance in decision-making between patients with advanced cancer and caregivers from the perspective of healthcare professionals in specialist palliative care: A focus group study.
Article in Palliative & supportive care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesPatients with advanced cancer, their caregivers, and healthcare professionals can differ in their preferences for patient treatment and care. The objectives of this study were to (1) identify what healthcare professionals in specialist palliative care feel aids or challenges patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers to manage their discordance, and (2) decipher what is helpful or challenging for healthcare professionals themselves to manage discordance between patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers.
methodsA qualitative study was conducted comprising online focus groups with 19 healthcare professionals from different professions in specialist palliative care. Participants were purposively and snowball sampled, and recruited from specialist palliative care settings, including hospital, hospice, and community-based care. The data were member checked and analyzed using thematic analysis.
resultsTrust and consistent communication between the patient, caregiver, and healthcare professional, were considered by participants as helpful for patients and caregivers to manage discordance. Emotional and psychological burden for both the patient and caregiver together with preexisting conflict between the patient and caregiver, were perceived as barriers for patients and caregivers to manage their discordance. Knowledge and expertise gained from practice combined with professional resilience and peer support enabled participants to help patients and caregivers navigate discordance. Relational conflict between the patient and caregiver combined with participants' own uncertainty about ethical and legal connotations of helping the patient and caregiver resolve their differences, were barriers to helping the patient and caregiver manage their discordance. SIGNIFICANCE OF
resultsInterventions focused on assisting patients with advanced cancer in palliative care and their caregivers manage their differences in decision-making could serve to alleviate emotional burden for both the patient and caregiver. Healthcare professionals in specialist palliative care value the perspective of both patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers when helping them manage their discordance in decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.