Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41424221›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine2025

Upper extremity pain after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis on primary prevention.

Memnune A Denizli, Gauthier Everard, Patricia Dessart, Samar M Hatem

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Memnune A DenizliDepartment of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Centre Hospitalier Valisana - site VALIDA, Brussels, Belgium - memnune.denizli@student.uclouvain.be.
Gauthier EverardNeuro Musculo Skeletal Lab (NMSK), Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Patricia DessartDepartment of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Samar M HatemDepartment of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Centre Hospitalier Valisana - site VALIDA, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPost-stroke upper extremity (UE) pain is a frequent and debilitating problem, with an incidence of 15 to 40% at 6 months. No clinical guidelines are available on the primary prevention of UE pain. The aim of this research was to identify and summarize the effectiveness of methods for the primary prevention of post-stroke UE pain. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: This systematic review received no external funding and was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023445110). Two independent investigators searched PubMed, PEDro, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, SCOPUS and EBSCO (Cinahl Complete) until January 30 EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A systematic review of 29 eligible articles (total number of patients: N.=1436) identified 7 categories of prevention methods: orthotics, taping, exercise, positioning, neuromuscular stimulation, intramuscular drug injections and education. Meta-analysis showed with a very low level of certainty that orthotics (SMD=0.45; 95% CI=-0.24 to 1.14; P=0.2; I

conclusionsThis meta-analysis revealed, with a very low-certainty of evidence, that the effect of primary prevention methods on UE pain after stroke is uncertain. An increased number of studies is necessary in this area of clinical research. A combination of methods may increase the clinical relevance of preventive strategies.

Indexed as

Primary PreventionStrokeStroke RehabilitationUpper ExtremityHumans

Identifiers

PMID41424221
PMCPMC12824599

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.