Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41424552›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025

Genetic architecture and genomic prediction of vase life in carnation.

Hugo H Tavera, Dominik Losert, Maike Boxriker, Robert Boehm, Carola Zenke-Philippi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hugo H TaveraInstitute of Agronomy and Plant Breeding II, Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany.
Dominik LosertKlemm + Sohn GmbH & Co KG, Stuttgart, Germany.
Maike BoxrikerKlemm + Sohn GmbH & Co KG, Stuttgart, Germany.
Robert BoehmKlemm + Sohn GmbH & Co KG, Stuttgart, Germany.
Carola Zenke-PhilippiInstitute of Agronomy and Plant Breeding II, Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vase life is a key trait for carnation cut flowers. A better understanding of the genetic basis of vase life is needed to implement selection methods like marker-assisted selection or genomic selection. Our objective was to investigate the genetic architecture of vase life and evaluate the potential of including known QTL in genomic prediction models to improve prediction accuracy. We constructed a linkage map from two segregating F1 carnation populations based on 5,412 SNP markers. Quantitative trait loci analysis detected one QTL for each of the two populations. The QTL were located on chromosomes 10 for population 1 and chromosome 11 for population 2 and accounted for 2.84 and 5.09% phenotypic variation, respectively. A genome-wide association study revealed potential genomic regions of interest for vase life. All detected markers accounted individually for less than 6% of phenotypic variation and were spread across ten chromosomes. This suggests that vase life is a polygenic trait. We conducted a cross-validation study in which 1 through 120 top scoring SNP markers were fitted as fixed effects to the baseline rigde-regression best unbiased linear prediction model. Fitting 1 to 50 top scoring SNP markers improved prediction accuracy compared to the baseline model by 0.016 on average. Fitting the 25 top scoring SNP markers resulted in the greatest prediction accuracy improvement, from 0.75 to 0.78. These findings extend the knowledge on the genetic basis of vase life and attest to the potential of genomic selection for breeding cut carnation with longer vase life.

Indexed as

carnationgenetic architecturegenomic selectionGWASQTL analysisvase life

Identifiers

PMID41424552
PMCPMC12714970

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.