ReviewTheranostics2026
Hydrogel adhesives for upper gastrointestinal wound healing.
Review in Theranostics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Drug Delivery and Visual Monitoring of Nd(ATA)-GelMA Composite Hydrogels.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Confined coordination regulation of rhodium in organosilica active framework for enhanced photothermal-enzymatic diabetic wound healing.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Acid-tolerant injectable bioadhesive for sutureless repair of large gastric perforation.Nature communications · 2026Article
- From Eradication to Holistic Regeneration: Pharmaceutics Strategies for Reshaping Gastric Homeostasis AgainstPharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Hydrogel-Based Therapeutic Strategies for Post-Cholecystectomy NAFLD: Targeting Bile Acid Signaling, Gut Microbiota, Inflammation, and Hepatic Fibrosis.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review discusses the latest progress in hydrogel adhesives for upper gastrointestinal wound healing. The specific acidic environment of the upper gastrointestinal tract makes treating upper gastrointestinal wounds, especially gastric bleeding and perforation, quite challenging. Recent research on hydrogels in biomedical applications has demonstrated immense potential, particularly in wound dressing. With three-dimensional network structures, hydrogels provide an efficient and safe strategy for hemostasis and wound repair in the digestive tract. Moreover, hydrogels possess excellent properties, including biocompatibility, biodegradability, mechanical strength, cell/tissue adhesion, and controllable release, making them suitable for complex wound-healing processes. This review summarizes the latest advancements in hydrogels for various upper gastrointestinal conditions, including esophageal stenosis, gastric ulcers, gastric bleeding, gastric perforation, and endoscopic submucosal dissection. We also highlight the merits and demerits of current hydrogel dressings to provide a deep understanding of their working mechanisms. Finally, the challenges and prospects of hydrogels for upper gastrointestinal applications are reviewed, aiming to inspire researchers in different fields and encourage the development of multifunctional hydrogels for effective upper gastrointestinal wound healing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.