ArticleJournal of nursing management2025
Improving Nursing Team Collaboration Through Nurses' Digital Literacy: A Variable-Centered and Person-Centered Perspective.
Article in Journal of nursing management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The relationship between digital literacy and clinical decision-making skills among student nurses: a cross sectional study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Heterogeneity in nurses' attitudes toward artificial intelligence: a latent profile analysis.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Article
- Traditional Chinese medicine nursing competency and its correlates among clinical nurses in Guangyuan City, China.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Improving Nursing Team Collaboration Through Nurses' Digital Literacy: A Variable-Centered and Person-Centered Perspective.Journal of nursing management · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Digital technologies have transformed nursing practices, enhancing efficiency while increasing the complexity of information. Although digital literacy enables nurses to manage digital tools effectively, its impact on team collaboration remains underexplored. This study investigates the influence of digital literacy on nursing team collaboration ability and its underlying mechanisms. Methods: This study was conducted from March to July 2025 in a tertiary Grade A hospital in Hangzhou, China, involving 495 nurses. We employed scales for digital literacy, situational awareness, psychological safety climate, and team collaboration to collect data. The Process Model 6 was used to test the chain-like mediating effects of situational awareness and psychological safety climate on the relationship between nurses' digital literacy and their ability to collaborate within the nursing team. Latent profile analysis was applied to classify situational awareness and psychological safety climate into latent categories. Results: Digital literacy is significantly and positively associated with nursing team collaboration. Further mediation analysis revealed that situational awareness and psychological safety climate acted as chain-like mediators between digital literacy and team collaboration. From the individual-centered perspective, situational awareness and psychological safety climate were categorized into three subgroups: high psychological safety climate-high situational awareness, medium psychological safety climate-medium situational awareness, and low psychological safety climate-low situational awareness. Conclusion: Hospital administrators and nursing team leaders should prioritize the development of nurses' digital literacy and optimize the situational awareness and psychological safety climate in nursing environments to enhance team collaboration and overall healthcare service quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.