ReviewFrontiers in sleep2025
Sleep fragmentation in critically ill children: a review of contributing factors in the pediatric intensive care unit and neurodevelopmental outcomes.
Review in Frontiers in sleep, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness of combined versus single circadian interventions in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units: a systematic review with meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Sedative medications: a potentially modifiable risk factor for improving neurocognitive outcomes after critical illness in infants and children.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sleep is a critical neurobiological process essential for brain maturation, emotional regulation, cognitive development, and overall organ system homeostasis. In the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), sleep architecture is frequently disrupted by environmental stimuli, sedation, and clinical interventions, resulting in sleep fragmentation. Unlike sleep deprivation, sleep fragmentation preserves sleep duration but impairs its continuity and depth, disproportionately affecting slow-wave sleep, that is essential for growth, healing, in addition to immune function and REM sleep, that is fundamental for synaptic plasticity, neurogenesis, and memory consolidation. These disruptions are particularly concerning in children, who require more sleep than adults due to ongoing neurogenesis and rapid somatic growth, rendering them uniquely vulnerable to adverse effects. Emerging evidence links fragmented sleep in the PICU to altered neurodevelopmental trajectories and increased risk of Pediatric Post-Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS-p), with delirium serving as a key mediator. Despite promising adult studies on sleep-promoting interventions and EEG-based monitoring, pediatric research remains limited. Future research should prioritize objective sleep monitoring, developmental tailoring of care protocols, and longitudinal studies to clarify the impact of sleep fragmentation on recovery and neurodevelopment. This narrative review highlights the urgent need to recognize and preserve sleep as a modifiable determinant of neurocognitive outcomes in critically ill children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.