Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41425311›Full record

ReviewACS measurement science au2025

Hydrogels for Analyte Sensing.

Katia Cherifi, Simon Matoori

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS measurement science au, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Katia CherifiFaculté de Pharmacie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec H3T 1J4, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9950-0813
Simon MatooriFaculté de Pharmacie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec H3T 1J4, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1559-0950

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hydrogels have emerged as a versatile platform technology for analyte sensing, offering unique advantages in tunable chemistry, for loading with sensors across multiple length scales, and biocompatibility. These smart materials undergo predictable changes in optical properties, conductivity, swelling, and porosity upon analyte interaction, enabling their function as biosensors. While hydrogels can respond to a variety of stimuli, their responses are most effectively quantified through optical and electrical readouts, which enable direct, real-time, and quantitative sensing in complex biological fluids. Optical approaches leverage fluorescence, chemiluminescence, and colorimetry, whereas electrical approaches leverage conductive fillers or redox-active groups. Hybrid platforms integrate multiple readout mechanisms, enhancing sensitivity, robustness, and multiplexing capabilities. Many of these systems were validated in various biological matrices, such as interstitial fluid, sweat, and wound exudates. Beyond technical advances, we discuss translational challenges including selectivity, stability, nonreversibility, signal standardization, device portability, and regulatory approval, as well as emerging opportunities in coupling hydrogel sensors with artificial intelligence for improved data interpretation and clinical integration. Together, these developments position hydrogel-based diagnostics as promising candidates for next-generation, real-time, point-of-care biosensing.

Indexed as

analytical chemistrybiomaterialsbiosensingdiagnosticshydrogels

Identifiers

PMID41425311
PMCPMC12715737

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.