Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41425822›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in psychiatry2025

Autism, bullying, and mental health: a comprehensive systematic review.

Wid H Daghustani, Eid G Abo Hamza, Rachel Hogg, Ahmed Moustafa

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wid H DaghustaniSpecial Education Department, Learning and Developmental Disabilities Programme, Arabian Gulf University, Manama, Bahrain.
Eid G Abo HamzaCollege of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
Rachel HoggSchool of Psychology, Charles Sturt University, Albury, NSW, Australia.
Ahmed MoustafaDepartment of Human Anatomy and Physiology, University of Johannesburg, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review investigates the relationship between autism, vulnerability to bullying, and the impact of bullying on mental health for this cohort. Neurotypical social mores can be exclusionary, creating social risks for autistic people, while differences in communication and social engagement can impact peer-to-peer interaction, making autistic people more vulnerable to bullying and social discrimination. The current systematic review investigates risk factors related to the bullying of autistic people, considering both societal and individual factors. Our PRIMA guided search reported 74 studies. Our results show that the prevalence of bullying of autistic individuals vary across studies, autistic individuals face verbal, social, and physical bullying, and that bullying was found to lead to the development of depression, anxiety, and social withdrawal. The importance of education, creating inclusive environments, building resilience, collaborative efforts, policy and legislation, mental health support, and prevention and protection implications, are discussed. By implementing these strategies, we can work to reduce vulnerability to bullying in autistic people as well as promote their overall well-being. This review emphasises the importance of comprehensive interventions and support systems in combating bullying and improving the lives of autistic people.

Indexed as

autismbullyingmental healthprevalencepreventionprotectionrisk factorsvulnerability

Identifiers

PMID41425822
PMCPMC12715608

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.