ArticleSultan Qaboos University medical journal2025
Physicians' Knowledge, Perceptions and Use of Large Language Models in Clinical Practice:
Article in Sultan Qaboos University medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Knowledge, attitude, and perception of artificial intelligence among medical residents in Oman: readiness for clinical practice.BMC medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study assessed the knowledge, perceptions and use of ChatGPT and other large language models (LLMs) among physicians at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital (SQUH), Oman. It also explored perceived benefits, barriers and ethical concerns regarding artificial intelligence (AI) integration into clinical practice. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted between September and December 2024 using a structured online questionnaire distributed to physicians across different specialties. The survey covered demographics, familiarity with LLMs, applications in medical education, research, clinical care, administrative tasks and ethical considerations. Results: A total of 146 physicians were included (response rate = 48.7%); 65.1% were familiar with ChatGPT or other LLMs and 70.5% had used them, mainly for education (47.9%) and research (46.6%). Use in clinical practice (29.5%) and administrative tasks (18.5%) was less frequent. Most physicians perceived LLMs as enhancing research (82.9%), education (79.5%), administrative work (74.4%) and patient care (54.1%). While 89.8% believed LLMs could improve professional work, only 39.7% expressed confidence in integrating outputs while upholding academic standards. Ethical concerns were widespread (96.6%), focusing on reliability, accuracy and data privacy. Despite low awareness of ethical guidelines (15.1%), 87.0% expressed willingness to engage in AI-related training. Male physicians reported higher use for research and diagnostics ( Conclusion: Physicians at SQUH demonstrated moderate familiarity and cautious optimism towards LLMs. Addressing gaps in training and ethical awareness is crucial for responsible AI adoption in clinical and academic practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.