Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41425843›Full record

ArticleSultan Qaboos University medical journal2025

Physicians' Knowledge, Perceptions and Use of Large Language Models in Clinical Practice:

Rahma Al Kindi, Hana Al Sumry, Aisha Al Khamisi, Wijdan Al Rashaidi, Hamza Al Salmi, Adhari Al Zaabi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sultan Qaboos University medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rahma Al KindiDepartment of Family Medicine & Public Health, Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, University Medical City, Muscat, Oman.ORCID 0000-0002-3686-8624
Hana Al SumryDepartment of Family Medicine & Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman.ORCID 0000-0002-9147-6164
Aisha Al KhamisiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, University Medical City, Muscat, Oman.ORCID 0009-0004-4142-0148
Wijdan Al RashaidiCollege of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman.ORCID 0009-0008-5171-1458
Hamza Al SalmiCollege of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman.ORCID 0009-0002-1932-9482
Adhari Al ZaabiDepartment of Human & Clinical Anatomy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman.ORCID 0000-0003-4290-1272

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study assessed the knowledge, perceptions and use of ChatGPT and other large language models (LLMs) among physicians at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital (SQUH), Oman. It also explored perceived benefits, barriers and ethical concerns regarding artificial intelligence (AI) integration into clinical practice. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted between September and December 2024 using a structured online questionnaire distributed to physicians across different specialties. The survey covered demographics, familiarity with LLMs, applications in medical education, research, clinical care, administrative tasks and ethical considerations. Results: A total of 146 physicians were included (response rate = 48.7%); 65.1% were familiar with ChatGPT or other LLMs and 70.5% had used them, mainly for education (47.9%) and research (46.6%). Use in clinical practice (29.5%) and administrative tasks (18.5%) was less frequent. Most physicians perceived LLMs as enhancing research (82.9%), education (79.5%), administrative work (74.4%) and patient care (54.1%). While 89.8% believed LLMs could improve professional work, only 39.7% expressed confidence in integrating outputs while upholding academic standards. Ethical concerns were widespread (96.6%), focusing on reliability, accuracy and data privacy. Despite low awareness of ethical guidelines (15.1%), 87.0% expressed willingness to engage in AI-related training. Male physicians reported higher use for research and diagnostics ( Conclusion: Physicians at SQUH demonstrated moderate familiarity and cautious optimism towards LLMs. Addressing gaps in training and ethical awareness is crucial for responsible AI adoption in clinical and academic practice.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeLanguagePerceptionPhysiciansAdultArtificial IntelligenceCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHospitals, UniversityHumansLarge Language ModelsMaleMiddle AgedOmanSurveys and QuestionnairesArtificial IntelligenceClinical PracticeEthicsLarge Language ModelsMedical EducationOman

Identifiers

PMID41425843
PMCPMC12716350

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.