Evidence mapPaperPMID 41426032Full record

ReviewKidney international reports2025

CKDs at the Crossroads: From Failures to Future Therapies.

Farah Wehbe, Mark Elliott, Adeera Levin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Kidney international reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Farah WehbeDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, St. Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Mark ElliottDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, St. Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Adeera LevinDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, St. Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a public health emergency because it is common and carries an increasing burden of morbidity and mortality. Until recently, treatment options for CKD and its adverse systemic effects were limited; however, we now have multiple approved therapies and a growing pipeline of promising treatments under evaluation. Despite the strong evidence and guideline recommendations supporting the broad use of approved therapies, uptake in practice remains lower than expected, potentially limiting the benefits of these advances. Early identification of CKD remains a prerequisite for therapy, yet screening and cost-effectiveness continue to be debated globally. In this review, we discuss the currently available pharmacologic treatments for CKD that have proven kidney and cardiac benefits with a specific focus on addressing barriers to implementation and ongoing trials that will inform their routine clinical use. We then discuss treatments that are in late-phase clinical trials that may expand the therapeutic options for CKD in the next few years. This will necessitate a personalized approach to management to determine which therapies will work best for which patients. Finally, we touch on therapeutic strategies that did not demonstrate clinical benefits despite rational physiologic support. This review addresses the know-do gap that exists in applying proven therapies for people with CKD and provides clinicians with practical tools and knowledge to improve clinical uptake, while acknowledging global challenges of access and affordability.

Indexed as

chronic kidney diseasediabetic kidney diseaseendothelin receptor antagonistsmineralocorticoid receptor antagonistsSGLT2 inhibitorstreatment

Identifiers

PMID41426032
PMCPMC12712514

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.