Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41426301›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2025

Lexical retrieval in fluent and nonfluent aphasia: a network analysis of verbal fluency data.

Catherine T Pham, Nichol Castro, Jiyeon Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Lexical Search and Retrieval in Aphasia: A Computational Analysis of Semantic Fluency.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Catherine T PhamDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States.
Nichol CastroDepartment of Communicative Disorders and Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States.
Jiyeon LeeDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States.

Funding

Implicit Structural Priming as a Treatment Component in AphasiaR01DC019129 · NIDCD · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI LEE, JIYEON · 2021 to 2025
$3.1M
Word- and Structure-driven Sentence Production in AphasiaR21DC015868 · NIDCD · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI LEE, JIYEON · 2018 to 2020
$448k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC019129NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC015868
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lexical retrieval is commonly impaired in many persons with aphasia (PWA). Verbal fluency tasks are often used to assess lexical retrieval ability. However, common methods of analyzing verbal fluency data (e.g., total number of appropriate responses, clustering and switching) fail to adequately capture the underlying organization of the mental lexicon. To better understand the nature of lexical-semantic organization in aphasia, this study applied a semantic network approach to verbal fluency data obtained from 120 healthy controls and 127 PWA (64 fluent and 63 nonfluent). Participants named as many animal category members as they could in 1 min, and their responses were converted into semantic networks. Global network metrics were computed for each group, including average shortest path length, clustering coefficient, and modularity. Compared to the healthy control network, the PWA network was less integrated and more fragmented, reflected by longer average shortest path lengths, reduced clustering, and higher modularity. These disruptions were especially evident in the nonfluent PWA network compared to the fluent PWA network. Complementary spreading activation and percolation analyses demonstrated that PWA networks were both less efficient and less resilient to disruption. Our results demonstrate that network-based analyses of verbal fluency provide a sensitive measure of lexical-semantic organization in aphasia, revealing structural disruptions that are not fully captured by traditional analyses. More broadly, this approach highlights how network science can advance theories of lexical-semantic organization and inform the development of individualized clinical assessments and treatment strategies.

Indexed as

aphasiagraph theorylanguagelexical retrievalsemantic networkverbal fluency

Identifiers

PMID41426301
PMCPMC12714882

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.