ReviewFrontiers in oncology2025
Artificial intelligence in oncology drug development and management: a precision medicine perspective.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Executor to Orchestrator: The Pharmacology Scientist in the Age of Agentic AI.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Review
- AI-based augmentation of oncology clinical trials.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Applications and prospects of artificial intelligence and digital medicine in pediatric nasal skull base tumors.Pediatric investigation · 2026Review
- The dual role of the crosstalk between autophagy and ferroptosis in lung cancer treatment: Advances in mechanisms and therapeutic strategies (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Integrating artificial intelligence across the cancer drug discovery pipeline using a design-test-refine workflow.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- From algorithms to clinical execution: A cross-validated knowledge atlas of AI-enabled precision care (2015-2025).Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The management of oncology drugs is inherently complex, facing challenges such as high development costs, prolonged timelines, and substantial inter-patient heterogeneity. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have introduced transformative capabilities across the entire cancer drug lifecycle-from target discovery and compound screening to clinical trial optimization, individualized therapy, toxicity management, supply chain logistics, and regulatory oversight. AI enables precise target identification, accelerates virtual drug screening and molecular design, and enhances clinical trial efficiency through intelligent patient stratification and adaptive protocols. Moreover, AI facilitates personalized treatment decision-making, early prediction of drug resistance, and real-time toxicity surveillance, while improving pharmacovigilance and post-market drug evaluation using real-world data. Here, "post-market drug evaluation" refers to real-world effectiveness and safety assessment using spontaneous reports (e.g., FAERS/VigiBase) and EHR/claims-based outcomes, rather than cost-effectiveness analyses. Examples include EHR-NLP to surface immune-related adverse events, AI-assisted trial recruitment and adaptive designs, and individualized dosing frameworks (e.g., CURATE.AI). Despite its enormous promise, AI-driven oncology drug management faces notable challenges in data integration, model interpretability, clinical translation, fairness, and regulatory governance. This review comprehensively summarizes the current applications of AI in oncology pharmacology, highlights key opportunities and barriers, and explores future directions at the intersection of AI, precision medicine, and cancer therapeutics. Future priorities include prospective multi-site evaluations, fairness auditing, and continuous post-market algorithmovigilance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.