Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41426328›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2025

Artificial intelligence in oncology drug development and management: a precision medicine perspective.

Caixia Fang, Pengfa Zhou, Xuerong Zhang, Yongsheng He, Qingwei Yang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. AI-based augmentation of oncology clinical trials.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Caixia FangPharmacy Clinical Research Centre, Qingyang People's Hospital, Qingyang, China.
Pengfa ZhouDepartment of Pharmacy, Qingyang People's Hospital, Qingyang, China.
Xuerong ZhangPharmacy Clinical Research Centre, Qingyang People's Hospital, Qingyang, China.
Yongsheng HePharmacy Clinical Research Centre, Qingyang People's Hospital, Qingyang, China.
Qingwei YangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Qingyang People's Hospital, Qingyang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The management of oncology drugs is inherently complex, facing challenges such as high development costs, prolonged timelines, and substantial inter-patient heterogeneity. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have introduced transformative capabilities across the entire cancer drug lifecycle-from target discovery and compound screening to clinical trial optimization, individualized therapy, toxicity management, supply chain logistics, and regulatory oversight. AI enables precise target identification, accelerates virtual drug screening and molecular design, and enhances clinical trial efficiency through intelligent patient stratification and adaptive protocols. Moreover, AI facilitates personalized treatment decision-making, early prediction of drug resistance, and real-time toxicity surveillance, while improving pharmacovigilance and post-market drug evaluation using real-world data. Here, "post-market drug evaluation" refers to real-world effectiveness and safety assessment using spontaneous reports (e.g., FAERS/VigiBase) and EHR/claims-based outcomes, rather than cost-effectiveness analyses. Examples include EHR-NLP to surface immune-related adverse events, AI-assisted trial recruitment and adaptive designs, and individualized dosing frameworks (e.g., CURATE.AI). Despite its enormous promise, AI-driven oncology drug management faces notable challenges in data integration, model interpretability, clinical translation, fairness, and regulatory governance. This review comprehensively summarizes the current applications of AI in oncology pharmacology, highlights key opportunities and barriers, and explores future directions at the intersection of AI, precision medicine, and cancer therapeutics. Future priorities include prospective multi-site evaluations, fairness auditing, and continuous post-market algorithmovigilance.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceclinical trialsdrug developmentoncologypharmacovigilanceprecision medicinereal-world evidencetoxicity prediction

Identifiers

PMID41426328
PMCPMC12711520

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.