Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41426408›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychology2025

Why clinical neuropsychology matters in schizophrenia care.

Merete Glenne Øie, Fernando Barbosa, Sandra Lettner, Gus Baker, Cedric Duarte, Erik Hessen, Torill Ueland

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Merete Glenne ØieDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Fernando BarbosaLaboratory of Neuropsychophysiology, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Sandra LettnerAustrian Society of Neuropsychology, Hohenzell, Austria.
Gus BakerDivision of Neurosciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Cedric DuarteDepartment of Psychology, Hôpitaux Robert Schuman, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Erik HessenDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Torill UelandDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive impairments in schizophrenia are widespread, persistent throughout the illness course, and significantly impact quality of life and functional outcomes. Integrating neuropsychological evaluations into routine clinical care is essential for early identification of cognitive impairments. This approach facilitates the implementation of personalized treatment strategies, including tailored neuropsychological rehabilitation, to promote functional recovery. Although recommended by national and international guidelines, many individuals with schizophrenia do not receive neuropsychological assessment. This article emphasizes the integral role of clinical neuropsychology in schizophrenia care, focusing on six key areas: (1) cognitive domains to assess; (2) addressing subjective cognitive complaints; (3) the impact of symptoms, medication, and substance use on cognitive function; (4) test administration and evaluation procedures; (5) the utilization of neuropsychological results and feedback; and (6) the design and implementation of individualized neuropsychological rehabilitation.

Indexed as

clinical neuropsychologycognitive functionfunctional outcomesneuropsychological evaluationneuropsychological rehabilitationschizophreniasubjective complaints

Identifiers

PMID41426408
PMCPMC12715811

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.