ArticleTobacco use insights2025
No Change in Illicit Tobacco Use Following the Introduction of Standardised Packaging? A Longitudinal Online Survey in the United Kingdom.
Article in Tobacco use insights, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The tobacco industry has argued for decades that standardised packaging would lead to an increase in illicit tobacco use, but this is not supported by current evidence. Objective: To explore longer-term associations between standardised packaging and illicit tobacco use. Design: The Adult Tobacco Policy Survey is a longitudinal online survey with people who smoke or who previously smoked aged 16 and older in the United Kingdom (UK), with one wave pre-standardised packaging (2016) and three waves post-standardised packaging (2017, 2019, 2022). Methods: Participants who smoke and who bought cigarettes or roll-your-own (RYO) tobacco were asked where they last bought, and usually buy, cigarettes or RYO tobacco to identify illicit purchasing channels. They were also asked whether they purchased potentially illicit cigarettes or RYO (with no or incorrect Warnings, Smuggled, or Fake (WSF) in the last three months and, if so, how often, why, and price paid. Results: People who smoke were less likely to report buying illicit (WSF) cigarettes or RYO in 2019 (11.2%) and 2022 (11.4%) relative to 2016 (13.2%), although this only remained significant in adjusted models in 2022. For participants that purchased or received any illicit (WSF) tobacco product, low cost, high availability and opportunism were the key reasons for doing so. In comparison, relatively few people who smoke reported 'packs looking nice' as a reason for purchasing illicit tobacco pre- and post-standardised packaging. Conclusion: Evidence from four waves of longitudinal data suggests that there was no increase in illicit tobacco use in the UK following the introduction of standardised packaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.