ArticleFrontiers in genetics2025
Integrating GWAS and machine learning for disease risk prediction in the Taiwanese Hakka population.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- AI-driven integration of genomic and exposome data for cancer risk: the combined risk score (CRS).Human genomics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified numerous loci associated with complex diseases, yet their predictive power in small or genetically homogeneous populations remains limited. Integrating machine learning with GWAS offers a path to improve risk prediction and uncover functional variants relevant to precision medicine. Methods: DNA samples from Taiwanese Hakka individuals with type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and eye diseases were analyzed. After standard quality control, 295,589 SNPs were retained. Fourteen machine-learning algorithms were evaluated using SNPs selected through traditional GWAS filtering and refined via wrapper-based feature selection with a best-first search algorithm. Model performance was assessed by internal cross-validation and external validation using Taiwan Biobank data, and functional annotation was conducted through GTEx v10 cis-eQTL analysis. Results: Predictive models relying solely on significant GWAS SNPs achieved moderate internal accuracy but limited generalizability. Incorporating feature-selected SNPs markedly improved performance: the Random Forest model achieved accuracies above 88% in cross-validation and above 85% in external validation, confirmed by 1,000× bootstrap resampling. eQTL analysis identified functional associations such as rs12121653-KDM5B and rs12121653-MGAT4EP, implicating pathways involved in metabolic and mitochondrial regulation. Discussion: These findings demonstrate that integrating GWAS with machine-learning-based feature selection enables the construction of robust, population-specific disease risk models. Given the small sample size of the discovery cohort (n = 96), all predictive results should be interpreted as exploratory. We employed stringent cross-validation and 1,000× bootstrap resampling to reduce overfitting, and genomic control metrics (QQ plots and λGC values) were evaluated to ensure no major test statistic inflation. Independent large-scale validation will still be required. The approach effectively captures additive and interaction-driven genetic components and provides a scalable framework for applying precision medicine to underrepresented or isolated populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.