Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41427248›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2025

Integrating GWAS and machine learning for disease risk prediction in the Taiwanese Hakka population.

Jing-Hong Xiao, Hsiao-Yen Kang, Li-Ching Wu, Tien Hsu, Chin-Pyng Wu, Li-Jen Su

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jing-Hong Xiao *Department of Biomedical Science and Engineering, National Central University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.
Hsiao-Yen Kang *Department of Family Medicine, Department of Community Medicine, Landseed International Hospital, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.
Li-Ching WuDepartment of Biomedical Science and Engineering, National Central University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.
Tien HsuGraduate Institute of Biomedical Sciences, China Medical University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.
Chin-Pyng WuCritical Care Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Landseed International Hospital, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.
Li-Jen SuDepartment of Biomedical Science and Engineering, National Central University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified numerous loci associated with complex diseases, yet their predictive power in small or genetically homogeneous populations remains limited. Integrating machine learning with GWAS offers a path to improve risk prediction and uncover functional variants relevant to precision medicine. Methods: DNA samples from Taiwanese Hakka individuals with type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and eye diseases were analyzed. After standard quality control, 295,589 SNPs were retained. Fourteen machine-learning algorithms were evaluated using SNPs selected through traditional GWAS filtering and refined via wrapper-based feature selection with a best-first search algorithm. Model performance was assessed by internal cross-validation and external validation using Taiwan Biobank data, and functional annotation was conducted through GTEx v10 cis-eQTL analysis. Results: Predictive models relying solely on significant GWAS SNPs achieved moderate internal accuracy but limited generalizability. Incorporating feature-selected SNPs markedly improved performance: the Random Forest model achieved accuracies above 88% in cross-validation and above 85% in external validation, confirmed by 1,000× bootstrap resampling. eQTL analysis identified functional associations such as rs12121653-KDM5B and rs12121653-MGAT4EP, implicating pathways involved in metabolic and mitochondrial regulation. Discussion: These findings demonstrate that integrating GWAS with machine-learning-based feature selection enables the construction of robust, population-specific disease risk models. Given the small sample size of the discovery cohort (n = 96), all predictive results should be interpreted as exploratory. We employed stringent cross-validation and 1,000× bootstrap resampling to reduce overfitting, and genomic control metrics (QQ plots and λGC values) were evaluated to ensure no major test statistic inflation. Independent large-scale validation will still be required. The approach effectively captures additive and interaction-driven genetic components and provides a scalable framework for applying precision medicine to underrepresented or isolated populations.

Indexed as

algorithmic rulesdisease risk predictiongenome-wide association studiesmachine learningtype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID41427248
PMCPMC12713315

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.