ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Inferring Cell Differentiation Dynamics with Unobserved Progenitors.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessing the inference of single-cell phylogenies and population dynamics from CRISPR lineage recordings.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A cell differentiation map describes the transitions between cell types during a developmental process, and determining this map is a key challenge in developmental biology. Recent single-cell lineage tracing technologies generate lineage trees that describe the history of cell divisions during a developmental process but do not directly measure differentiation events between cell types. Current approaches to infer cell differentiation maps from cell lineage trees make unrealistic assumptions about the developmental process, do not allow for unobserved progenitor cell types, or do not infer cell-type specific rates of growth and transitions. To address these issues, we introduce TROUPE, a likelihood-based framework that infers differentiation and growth dynamics directly from leaf-labeled cell lineage trees while allowing for unobserved progenitor types via biologically motivated potency constraints. We provide an efficient algorithm for computing the maximum likelihood transition and growth rates, as well as a simple model-selection scheme to choose the number of unobserved types. On simulations, TROUPE recovers transition and growth rates better than previous approaches even when there are unobserved types. We apply TROUPE to a model of mammalian development, Trunk-Like Structures (TLS), and show that TROUPE computes reasonable rates of self-renewal and differentiation in both standard and perturbed conditions.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.