ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2025
Itraconazole-associated adverse events in fungal infections: a study of a large real-world sample based on the FAERS database (2019-2024).
Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysis of ocular adverse events associated with SNRIs.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Real‑world analysis of Macular Oedema associated with Paclitaxel Formulations using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundItraconazole (ITZ) is a broad-spectrum antifungal agent widely used for the treatment and prevention of fungal infections, particularly systemic and cutaneous infections. Although considered safe, recent clinical reports and studies have indicated that ITZ can cause a range of adverse events (AEs), particularly affecting vital organs such as the heart and liver. The objective of this study was to evaluate ITZ-associated adverse events by conducting data mining using the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to assess potential safety risks.
methodsA retrospective pharmacovigilance analysis was performed using FAERS data from Q1 2019 to Q2 2024. Four disproportionality algorithms were applied to identify significant signals related to ITZ-AEs, including the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Empirical Bayes Geometric Mean (EBGM).
resultsFrom a total of 6,191,576 case reports in FAERS, 1,041 reports identified ITZ as the primary suspected (PS) agent linked to AEs. A total of 323 ITZ-associated AEs were identified across 16 organ systems at the preferred terms (PTs) level. Expected AEs, including general disorders, administration site conditions, cardiac disorders, and hepatobiliary disorders, were identified, consistent with the drug label. In addition, 31 unexpected AEs were detected, including left ventricular dysfunction (39 cases, EBGM 31.81/EBGM05 15.83), myositis (38 cases, EBGM 29.75/EBGM05 15.94), both associated with vascular disorders at the system organ class (SOC) level. These findings suggest the presence of potential adverse effects that are not currently addressed in the drug’s labeling.
conclusionsThis study identified 31 novel and unexpected AE signals associated with ITZ, which are consistent with clinical observations. These findings provide new insights into the safety profile of ITZ, highlighting the need for increased vigilance in clinical practice regarding its potential adverse effects. Future studies should validate these signals and explore their clinical implications to enhance drug safety monitoring and labeling updates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.