ArticleDiscover oncology2025
A signature constructed with circadian rhythm-related genes to predict the prognosis and therapy response for low-grade gliomas.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent studies suggest circadian rhythm-related genes are crucial for immune balance and potential therapeutic targets, but their role in low-grade gliomas (LGG) is not well understood. We analyzed their prognostic significance in glioma progression using predictive models. TCGA-LGG cohort data was analyzed utilizing univariate Cox regression and LASSO to create a strong prognostic model. Kaplan-Meier and ROC analyses validated the model's predictive accuracy, revealing significantly poorer survival outcomes in high-risk patients relative to those at low risk. Cox regression identified our gene signature as an independent prognosistic predictor. Decision curve analysis (DCA) and calibration supported the nomogram's predictive power. Further analyses, including gene alteration, functional enrichment, tumor immune microenvironment, and chemotherapy sensitivity, highlighted differences between risk groups. We also conducted immunohistochemical analyses on clinical samples and in vitro experiments with glioma cell lines. Our findings highlight the clinical importance of these genes and confirm the prognostic utility of the survival analysis model, suggesting its promise for guiding outcome prediction and immunotherapy strategies in LGG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.