ArticleJournal of insect science (Online)2025
Selection and evaluation of reference genes for quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction normalization in Pieris melete (Lepidoptera, Pieridae).
Article in Journal of insect science (Online), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of condition-specific optimal reference genes for qPCR data normalisation in pink bollworm Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders).Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
- Reference Genes for Expression Analyses by RT-qPCR inInsects · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate normalization of gene expression data in real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) relies on the identification of stably expressed reference genes, which remains uncharacterized in Pieris melete Ménétriés, a cruciferous crop pest with agricultural significance. This study systematically evaluated eight candidate reference genes (GAPDH, α-tub, β-actin, 18S, β-tub, EF1α, RPL27, RPS15) across four experimental conditions: developmental stages, tissues, temperature stresses, and diapause stages. Stability rankings were determined using four algorithms (geNorm, NormFinder, BestKeeper, ΔCt method) integrated via RefFinder. Results revealed that at different condition-specific stability patterns, RPL27 and EF1α were optimal for developmental stages, RPL27 paired with 18S were suitable for tissue analyses; EF1α and α-tub were stable at different temperature stresses, and RPL27 combined with RPS15 were stably expressed during diapause. Pairwise variation analysis confirmed that dual reference genes sufficiently enhanced normalization accuracy. This work provides the validated reference genes panel for P. melete, addressing a critical gap in molecular studies of this pest and ensuring robust gene expression analyses for future research on diapause regulation and pest control strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.