Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41428679›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Identification of diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for tuberculosis based on plasma proteomics.

Yan Hu, Chao Quan, Yuanyuan Zhou, Shangyan Liang, Xuan Wang, Jun Li, Wenqi Liu, Yuzhong Xu, Peng Liu

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yan HuCentral Laboratory, Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital, Wuhan Institute for Tuberculosis Control, The Hubei Branch of the National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Disease, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Chao QuanCentral Laboratory, Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital, Wuhan Institute for Tuberculosis Control, The Hubei Branch of the National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Disease, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Yuanyuan ZhouDepartment of Hematology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Shangyan LiangLaboratory Department, Shenzhen Baoan District People's Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Xuan WangCentral Laboratory, Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital, Wuhan Institute for Tuberculosis Control, The Hubei Branch of the National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Disease, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Jun LiCentral Laboratory, Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital, Wuhan Institute for Tuberculosis Control, The Hubei Branch of the National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Disease, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Wenqi LiuNational Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Yuzhong XuLaboratory Department, Shenzhen Baoan District People's Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Peng LiuCentral Laboratory, Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital, Wuhan Institute for Tuberculosis Control, The Hubei Branch of the National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Disease, Wuhan, Hubei, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8250-6093

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe differential diagnosis between Tuberculosis (TB) and Non-tuberculous Mycobacteria (NTM) has historically been constrained by the inadequate sensitivity and specificity of current diagnostic methods. Furthermore, distinguishing between Active Tuberculosis (ATB) and Latent Tuberculosis Infection (LTBI) poses significant challenges. This study aims to develop a molecular differentiation system for ATB, LTBI, and NTM by integrating plasma proteomics with multi-dimensional analytical techniques, while also exploring key biomarkers associated with disease progression and treatment response.

methodsUsing label-free quantitative technology, we conducted a plasma proteomics analysis across five groups: ATB, LTBI, NTM, Cured Patients (CPs), and Healthy Donors (HD). Differentially Expressed Proteins (DEPs) were identified through screening (FC > 1.5 or <0.67, P < 0.05), followed by Gene Ontology/KEGG pathway enrichment, STRING interaction network, and Mfuzz dynamic clustering analysis to systematically elucidate molecular characteristics. Experimental data were validated through a multidimensional quality control system (Pearson correlation coefficient, peptide distribution, molecular weight distribution, etc.). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was employed to detect the plasma expression levels of target proteins across the groups and to facilitate comparisons.

resultsThis study identified 1,338 non-redundant proteins across five cohorts. Comparative analysis revealed 142 DEPs across the three comparative groups (ATB, LTBI, and NTM), which were primarily localized in the extracellular domain. Key findings include: 27 DEPs in the ATB-LTBI group, primarily enriched in inflammatory responses (such as A2M, IL-1R2) and epithelial barrier functions (TGM3, KRT3); 69 DEPs in the ATB-NTM group, characterized by significant changes in immunoglobulin light chains (IGLV2-11) and innate immune effector molecules (S100A8); 46 DEPs in the NTM-LTBI group, closely related to lipid metabolism (APOC3) and extracellular matrix remodeling (FN1). KEGG pathway analysis revealed that DEPs in the ATB-LTBI group were enriched in nitrogen metabolism pathways, those in the ATB-NTM group were associated with thyroid hormone synthesis, and the NTM-LTBI group was involved in phagosome function. Dynamic clustering results showed six treatment response modules: Cluster 1/2 (riboflavin metabolism, complement coagulation pathway) were activated post-treatment, Cluster 3/4 (proteasome, cardiac signaling pathway) exhibited partial reversal in expression, and Cluster 5/6 (platelet activation, cytoskeleton) showed delayed regression. Research confirmed 10 differential proteins between the ATB-CPs and ATB-HD groups, including S100A8, LTA4H, and DEFA1B, which constitute a molecular fingerprint specific to ATB. ELISA validation confirmed significantly elevated S100A8 and GPX3 in ATB group, while NTM group showed higher FGB and lower ATRN levels.

conclusionsThis study systematically reveals the plasma proteomic characteristics under infection statuses caused by different mycobacteria. A discrimination framework for ATB/LTBI/NTM was constructed based on disease-specific differential proteins, overcoming the limitations of traditional diagnostic techniques in distinguishing infection states. Through dynamic analysis of six temporal therapeutic modules, the reprogramming patterns of the host protein network during tuberculosis treatment were elucidated. This research lays a multidimensional molecular foundation for the precise typing, personalized treatment, and prognostic evaluation of mycobacterial infections.

Indexed as

Blood ProteinsLatent TuberculosisMycobacterium Infections, NontuberculousProteomicsTuberculosisAdultAgedAntitubercular AgentsBiomarkersCohort StudiesDiagnosis, DifferentialDisease ProgressionEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHumansMaleAntitubercular AgentsBiomarkersBlood Proteins

Identifiers

PMID41428679
PMCPMC12721542

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.