ArticlePloS one2025
Effects of combination therapy of a CDK4/6 and MEK inhibitor in diffuse midline glioma preclinical models.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diffuse Midline Gliomas: Clinical, Diagnostic, and Therapeutic Perspectives.Biomedicines · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDiffuse midline glioma (DMG) is an incurable brain cancer without a single FDA-approved drug that prolongs survival. CDK4/6 inhibitors have been evaluated in children with DMG with limited efficacy. Since MAPK pathway activation is upstream of cell proliferation, we hypothesized that MEK inhibitors may increase the anti-tumor effects of CDK4/6 inhibitors. Here, we evaluated the efficacy of the CDK4/6 inhibitor ribociclib and the MEK inhibitor trametinib in human and murine DMG models to investigate combinational effects.
methodsWe conducted in vitro and in vivo assays using DMG cell lines from human patient-derived xenografts (PDX) and genetically engineered mouse (GEM) models. In vitro, we assessed synergy across human DMG lines. In vivo, we evaluated therapeutic effects with histological examinations, survival analysis, pharmacokinetic measurements, and RNA-sequencing analysis.
resultsIn vitro, ribociclib and trametinib had variable synergistic effects against human DMG cell lines. In vivo, a five-day treatment with combination therapy in the GEM DMG model significantly decreased cell proliferation and increased apoptosis compared with the vehicle, with trametinib having mostly cytotoxic effects and ribociclib having primarily cytostatic effects. In addition, a 21-day treatment with combination therapy significantly prolonged mice survival compared with the vehicle in the GEM DMG model (median survival: 112 days vs. 71.5 days, log rank test p = 0.0195). In an orthotopic PDX model, combination therapy did not prolong mice survival compared with vehicle, ribociclib, and trametinib. LC/MS analysis showed adequate drug delivery across the blood-brain-barrier (BBB) into tumor tissue in both GEM and PDX models. Transcriptomic analysis in the GEM model suggests that combination therapy inhibited the MAPK pathway and inflammation.
conclusionsCombination therapy with ribociclib and trametinib significantly prolonged survival in the GEM model but not in the PDX model, highlighting the importance of testing novel therapies in diverse models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.