Evidence mapPaperPMID 41428937Full record

Observational studyJMIR public health and surveillance2025

Workplace-Based Glucose Screening for Type 2 Diabetes in French Civil Servants: Prospective Observational Cohort Study.

Solène Petit, Florence Carrouel, Benjamin du Sartz de Vigneulles, Claude Dussart, Roger Salamon

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Solène PetitInstitute of Public Health, Epidemiology and Development (ISPED), Inserm U1219, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-3895-6163
Florence CarrouelLaboratory "Health, Systemic, Process" (P2S), UR4129, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 7 rue Guillaume Paradin, Lyon, 69002, France, 33 478785745.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6823-1636
Benjamin du Sartz de VigneullesLaboratory "Health, Systemic, Process" (P2S), UR4129, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 7 rue Guillaume Paradin, Lyon, 69002, France, 33 478785745.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2115-8141
Claude DussartLaboratory "Health, Systemic, Process" (P2S), UR4129, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 7 rue Guillaume Paradin, Lyon, 69002, France, 33 478785745.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1091-9139
Roger SalamonInstitute of Public Health, Epidemiology and Development (ISPED), Inserm U1219, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-1557-1029

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) remains one of the most underdiagnosed chronic conditions worldwide, despite its major contribution to cardiovascular and metabolic morbidity. In 2024, an estimated 589 million adults were living with diabetes globally, more than 90% of whom had T2D, and the prevalence is projected to reach 853 million by 2050. In France, approximately 4.1 million adults are affected, and nearly 1 in 4 individuals with diabetes remain undiagnosed. Therefore, early detection is essential to prevent complications. Workplace prevention strategies could improve early detection, particularly among employed adults with limited access to regular medical screening. In France, a health prevention organization has implemented a systematic glucose screening program for civil servants to identify individuals at risk of T2D or prediabetes. As the French public service includes 5.7 million workers-approximately 1 in 5 of the national workforce-this setting provides a unique opportunity to reach large, diverse, and often underserved segments of the adult population. Objective: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a systematic diabetes screening program as a preventive public health measure by determining the rate of newly detected diabetes cases and characterizing associated cardiometabolic risk factors within a large population of French civil servants. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted using data from a glucose screening program between January 2022 and February 2025. Participants with postprandial blood glucose levels >1.40 g/L were included in a follow-up cohort. Sociodemographic, clinical, and biological data were collected. Comparisons were performed using the chi-square or Fisher exact test for categorical variables and the Student t test (2-tailed) for continuous variables (P<.05). Analyses were restricted to complete cases to ensure robust comparisons. Results: Among 16,785 screened participants, 981 (5.8%) had postprandial glucose levels >1.40 g/L and 134 (0.8%) were eligible for the follow-up cohort. Participants were 59.5% (n=78) women and 40.5% (n=53) men, with a mean age of 51.3 (SD 8.9) years. Overall, 37.6% (n=50) of participants were overweight, 25.4% (n=34) were obese, 61.6% (n=77) reported insufficient physical activity, and 63.2% (n=84) had a family history of diabetes. Of the 134 eligible individuals, 70 (52.2%) completed medical follow-up, and among them, 9 (12.9%) received a confirmed diagnosis of T2D. Newly diagnosed individuals were predominantly male (n=7, 78%; P=.04) and more likely to be overweight or obese (n=9, 89%; P=.04). No significant differences in age, sex, or BMI were observed between followed and lost-to-follow-up participants. Conclusions: Systematic glucose screening in occupational or social health context identifies individuals at risk of diabetes or prediabetes and supports its integration into preventive health strategies to enhance early detection and reduce long-term complications. Larger prospective or randomized studies are warranted to confirm long-term benefits on diagnosis, care engagement, and cardiometabolic outcomes.

Indexed as

Blood GlucoseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Mass ScreeningWorkplaceAdultCohort StudiesFemaleFranceHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsBlood Glucosediabetes screeningFranceoccupational healthpreventionpublic service

Identifiers

PMID41428937
PMCPMC12721488

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.