Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41429653›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2026

A Comparative Study of Deep Learning and Classical Modeling Approaches for Protein-Ligand Binding Pose and Affinity Prediction in Coronavirus Main Proteases.

Yue Liu, Haocheng Tang, Taoyu Niu, Junmei Wang

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yue LiuDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Computational Chemical Genomics Screening Center, School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261, United States.ORCID 0009-0004-3506-4976
Haocheng TangDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Computational Chemical Genomics Screening Center, School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261, United States.ORCID 0009-0001-5702-2847
Taoyu NiuDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Computational Chemical Genomics Screening Center, School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261, United States.ORCID 0009-0004-2214-1397
Junmei WangDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Computational Chemical Genomics Screening Center, School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9607-8229

Funding

New Generation of General AMBER Force Field for Biomedical ResearchR01GM147673 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WANG, JUNMEI, YANG, WEI · 2022 to 2025
$1.5M
AI-Powered Biased Ligand DesignR01GM149705 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Junmei Wang · 2023 to 2026
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM147673NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM149705
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accurate prediction of protein-ligand binding poses and affinities is central to structure-based drug design. In this study, we first benchmarked three distinct pose generation strategies for data sets from the ASAP Antiviral Challenge 2025: molecular docking (Glide and AutoDock Vina), ligand-based superposition (FlexS), and deep learning-based modeling (AlphaFold3, Boltz-2, DiffDock and Gnina). We evaluated their performance on binding pose prediction for ligands targeting SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV main protease (Mpro). For binding affinity estimation, we implemented a machine learning-based scoring approach called ligand-residue interaction profile scoring function (LRIP-SF), which integrates molecular mechanics generalized Born surface area (MM-GBSA) energy decomposition with machine learning algorithms. Our results showed that deep learning-based modeling with AlphaFold3 achieved the highest pose prediction accuracy with a success rate of 88.1% and an average ligand root-mean-square deviation (LRMSD) of 1.12 Å. Moreover, binding poses predicted by AlphaFold3 enabled the most accurate potency predictions by LRIP-SF, with the lowest mean absolute error (MAE) and root-mean-square error (RMSE) in pIC

Indexed as

Coronavirus 3C ProteasesDeep LearningMiddle East Respiratory Syndrome CoronavirusSARS-CoV-2Antiviral AgentsBinding SitesHumansLigandsMolecular Docking SimulationProtein BindingProtein ConformationAntiviral AgentsCoronavirus 3C ProteasesLigands

Identifiers

PMID41429653
PMCPMC12801289

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.