ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2026
A Comparative Study of Deep Learning and Classical Modeling Approaches for Protein-Ligand Binding Pose and Affinity Prediction in Coronavirus Main Proteases.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The accurate prediction of protein-ligand binding poses and affinities is central to structure-based drug design. In this study, we first benchmarked three distinct pose generation strategies for data sets from the ASAP Antiviral Challenge 2025: molecular docking (Glide and AutoDock Vina), ligand-based superposition (FlexS), and deep learning-based modeling (AlphaFold3, Boltz-2, DiffDock and Gnina). We evaluated their performance on binding pose prediction for ligands targeting SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV main protease (Mpro). For binding affinity estimation, we implemented a machine learning-based scoring approach called ligand-residue interaction profile scoring function (LRIP-SF), which integrates molecular mechanics generalized Born surface area (MM-GBSA) energy decomposition with machine learning algorithms. Our results showed that deep learning-based modeling with AlphaFold3 achieved the highest pose prediction accuracy with a success rate of 88.1% and an average ligand root-mean-square deviation (LRMSD) of 1.12 Å. Moreover, binding poses predicted by AlphaFold3 enabled the most accurate potency predictions by LRIP-SF, with the lowest mean absolute error (MAE) and root-mean-square error (RMSE) in pIC
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.