ReviewThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2025
Physical activity interventions among children and adolescents in China: a scoping review through an equity lens.
Review in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Understanding the "how" and "why": A mixed methods process evaluation for the PRO-HIIT intervention.PloS one · 2026Article
- When equal resources fail to produce equal opportunity: a critical narrative mini review of implementation equity in school-based physical activity for adolescents.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEquity in health promotion is essential to ensuring fair opportunities for children to engage in physical activity (PA). While China has implemented numerous PA interventions, little is known about how these programs address or overlook equity considerations. This scoping review synthesizes evidence on equity measures in PA interventions among Chinese children.
methodsA scoping review was conducted following the guidance of PROGRESS-Plus framework to assess equity measures across PA interventions for children in China. Published studies were analysed to identify equity-related indicators including place of residence, ethnicity, occupation, sex, education, and household income. This review was registered on OSF registries ( https://osf.io/zbfpd ).
resultsSixty-five individual interventions were identified. Equity considerations were rarely explicit. Most interventions were concentrated in well-developed cities, with only two conducted in rural regions. Male participants slightly outnumbered females. Children from families with lower parental education or occupational status, as well as those from ethnic minoritised groups and children who are left-behind or displaced, were consistently underrepresented. While a number of interventions focused on children with health issues, these efforts were not intentionally designed to address PA inequities.
conclusionsEquity considerations are largely absent from PA interventions for Chinese children. The disproportionate region and sex focus, combined with neglect of rural, minority, and disadvantaged groups, suggests these interventions may unintentionally widen health disparities. Future efforts should apply an equity lens in PA interventions by prioritizing underserved children and considering upstream, policy-level strategies to promote fair and inclusive PA opportunities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.