ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2026
Model-informed precision dosing of carboplatin in cancer patients by leveraging myelosuppression data from electronic health records.
Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Model-informed precision dosing of carboplatin in cancer patients by leveraging myelosuppression data from electronic health records.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThis study aimed to develop and validate a population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (pop-PK-PD) model to describe carboplatin-induced myelosuppression in cancer patients and support dose individualization.
methodsData from 580 cancer patients treated with carboplatin at Amsterdam UMC between 2019 and 2022 were used for model development, focusing on lung, gynaecological and gastric/oesophageal cancers. Platelet (PLT) and neutrophil (NT) counts, along with patient-specific covariates (e.g., age, serum albumin, eGFR), were extracted from Electronic Health Records and used in the analysis. Given the absence of pharmacokinetic (PK) samples, PK parameters were derived from a literature carboplatin pop-PK model. Model applicability to inform personalized carboplatin dosing was evaluated on a separate cohort of 210 patients treated between 2022 and 2024 in the same centre.
resultsTwo joint Friberg models effectively described carboplatin-induced myelosuppression. Serum albumin, eGFR and paclitaxel and pemetrexed co-medications were included in the final model. On the test cohort, >85% of NT and >87% of PLT observations fell within the 90% confidence interval of Bayesian model predictions, confirming that the model can support dose adjustments for subsequent treatment cycles. An example of model-based dose adjustments is also presented with a simulation study.
conclusionsThe pop-PK-PD model demonstrated strong performance in describing and predicting carboplatin-induced myelosuppression, thus providing a valuable strategy for dose personalization. Further refinements and validation steps are needed before integrating such an approach into clinical workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.