ArticleGut microbes2026
Integrated multi-omic and symptom clustering reveals lower-gastrointestinal disorders of gut-brain interaction heterogeneity.
Article in Gut microbes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Editorial: Beyond gastrointestinal symptoms: psychosocial implications of disorders of gut-brain interaction.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rome IV disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI) subtypes are known to be unstable and demonstrate high rates of non-treatment response, likely indicating patient heterogeneity. Cluster analysis, a type of unsupervised machine learning, can identify homogeneous sub-populations. Independent cluster analyses of symptom and biological data have highlighted its value in predicting patient outcomes. Integrated clustering of symptom and biological data may provide a unique multimodal perspective that better captures the complexity of DGBI. Here, integrated symptom and multi-omic cluster analysis was performed on a cohort of healthy controls and patients with lower-gastrointestinal tract DGBI. Cluster stability was assessed by considering how frequently pairs of participants appeared in the same cluster between different bootstrapped datasets. Functional enrichment analysis was performed on the biological signatures of stable DGBI-predominant clusters, implicating disrupted ammonia handling and metabolism as possible pathophysiologies present in a subset of patients with DGBI. Integrated clustering revealed subtypes that were not apparent using a singular modality, suggesting a symptom-only classification is prone to capturing heterogeneous sub-populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.