ArticleJCI insight2026
Common clonal hematopoiesis driver mutations have disparate effects on macrophage cytokines, clonal expansion, and atherogenesis.
Article in JCI insight, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clonal haematopoiesis and cardiovascular disease, defining risk, filling gaps, and framing the future.NPJ cardiovascular health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) is the expansion of blood stem cells and progeny after somatic mutation. CHIP associates with increased cardiovascular disease (CVD), with inflammation from macrophages a proposed common effector. However, mouse CHIP studies are discordant for clonal expansion and inflammation. Similarly, directionality of association between CHIP and CVD remains debated. We investigated effects of 3 CHIP mutations on macrophage cytokines, clonal expansion, and atherosclerosis in parallel. We found that cytokine release and inflammasome activation are increased by Tet2 mutation but decreased by Dnmt3a. However, Jak2 mutant macrophages produced equivalent cytokine as WT. In mice, Tet2 mutants clonally expanded, but Dnmt3a and Jak2 mutants did not. Expansion was unaffected by systemic inflammation, while hyperlipidemia expanded Tet2-/- cells but not mono-allelic mutants. Similarly, human Mendelian randomization showed no effect of serum cytokines or CVD on CHIP risk. Experimental atherosclerosis was increased in females with Tet2 and males with Jak2, but it was unchanged with Dnmt3a mutations. Together, common CHIP mutations have disparate effects on macrophage cytokines and clonal expansion, and they have sex-dependent effects on atherogenesis, suggesting a common mechanism across CHIP is unlikely. Thus, CHIP mutations differ in pathophysiology and clinical sequelae across sexes and should be treated as different entities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.