Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41433267›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

WBA: Word Boundary Attention for Chinese Named Entity Recognition.

Zhongguo Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Zhongguo XuSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0627-948X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chinese words often exhibit a parallel structural relationship within sentences, while individual characters are sequentially connected. To capture this structural distinction, we extract the head and tail positions of characters within words and incorporate them into a relative positional encoding scheme. Building upon this design, we introduce Word Boundary Attention (WBA), a mechanism that assigns dynamic attention weights to characters and enhances their representations with contextual information derived from the word lattice. By explicitly modeling word boundaries, WBA effectively suppresses noise, improves word recognition, and leverages richer lexicon-based context during training. Extensive experiments across multiple datasets demonstrate that WBA consistently outperforms existing approaches, achieving, for instance, a 2.51% improvement over the base model on the Weibo dataset with YJ lexicon encoding. Furthermore, visualizations of the learned attention weights reveal the interactive relationships between words and characters, providing interpretable insights into the process of word discovery. The source code of the proposed method is publicly available at https://github.com/na978292231/WBA/tree/main/WBA4NER-main.

Indexed as

LanguageChinaHumansSemantics

Identifiers

PMID41433267
PMCPMC12725666

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.