ArticleEuropean journal of haematology2026
Improvements in Real-World Survival in the Setting of a Recent Paradigm Shift in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Treatment.
Article in European journal of haematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Therapeutic options for newly diagnosed (ND) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have increased in recent years, leading to a shift in the treatment paradigm from conventional, intensive chemotherapy toward targeted and less intensive therapy. Since 2017, there has been a surge in FDA approvals for novel therapies, including small molecule inhibitors and new combinations of chemotherapy and targeted drugs. It is unclear what effect these changes have had on overall survival in the real-world clinical setting over time. We retrospectively analyzed 501 patients with ND AML treated at an urban academic cancer center from 2015 to 2022 with respect to survival rates and treatment regimen utilization trends over time, in the context of AML risk category and whether allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) occurred. Among European LeukemiaNet 2022 intermediate risk ND AML patients who did not undergo HSCT, overall survival and relapse-free survival improved significantly in the early versus later cohort (2015-2018 vs. 2019-2022, respectively). These gains were not observed in the adverse-risk subgroup, where outcomes remain unchanged. First-line use of hypomethylating agent-based therapies increased seven-fold, while reliance on chemotherapy alone decreased by half. These findings highlight a meaningful shift in treatment patterns associated with improved outcomes overall, but an ongoing lack of progress in the highest-risk subgroups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.