Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41436650›Full record

ArticleJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2025

Integration of finite element method and artificial intelligence for evaluating PEEK composites in rib cage reconstruction process under impact conditions.

Yomna H Shash, Rana Hossam Elden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yomna H ShashBiomedical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt. Yomna.abdelhamid@h-eng.helwan.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2837-7849
Rana Hossam EldenBiomedical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rib cage reconstruction is critical for maintaining chest rigidity, protecting intrathoracic organs, and preserving vital physiological functions. Although titanium has traditionally been used for reconstruction due to its mechanical strength and biocompatibility, its limitations have prompted the search for alternative materials. The finite element method (FEM) is widely used to assess implant performance through stress analysis, while advances in artificial intelligence (AI) now allow the integration of FEM with predictive modeling to efficiently estimate mechanical responses. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using PEEK and PEEK composites as alternatives to metallic implants for rib reconstruction and to develop AI models capable of predicting stresses, strains, and deformations. Customized 3D models of a defective chest were reconstructed with implants made from PEEK, carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK (CFP), glass fiber-reinforced PEEK (GFP), and hydroxyapatite PEEK (HAP) as alternatives to titanium. FEM simulations were performed under lateral impact and sternal forces to extract mechanical responses, generating a comprehensive dataset used to train machine learning and deep learning regression models, including Linear Regression, Ridge Regression, Support Vector Regression, Decision Trees, Neural Networks, and LightGBM. Model performance was evaluated using R², MAE, MSE, RMSE, and computational efficiency. Results indicated that CFP 60% implants produced the lowest stress and strain levels on ribs and lungs, whereas pure PEEK and HAP 30% implants exhibited higher levels. GFP 30% and HAP 60% implants distributed tensile and compressive stresses similarly, though HAP 60% implants were prone to fracture due to excessive tensile stresses. AI models trained on FEM data achieved over 99.9% accuracy, demonstrating both predictive reliability and computational efficiency. These findings suggest that CFP (30% & 60%) and GFP (30% & 60%) composites are promising alternatives to titanium for rib reconstruction, and that integrating FEM with AI-based regression models can significantly optimize implant evaluation and design.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceKetonesPlastic Surgery ProceduresPolyethylene GlycolsRib CageBenzophenonesBiocompatible MaterialsCarbonCarbon FiberDurapatiteFinite Element AnalysisGlassHumansMaterials TestingPolymersProstheses and ImplantsBenzophenonesBiocompatible MaterialsCarbonCarbon FiberDurapatitefiberglassKetonespolyetheretherketonePolyethylene GlycolsPolymersTitanium

Identifiers

PMID41436650
PMCPMC12783314

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.