ArticleHigh blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension2026
Survey on Office Blood Pressure Measurement in Daily Practice in the Hypertension Centers of the Italian Society of Hypertension.
Article in High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sex Differences in the Usefulness of Unattended Blood Pressure Measurement in Patients with Arterial Hypertension.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionOffice blood pressure (BP) measurement is the cornerstone for the diagnosis of arterial hypertension.
aimTo investigate how office BP is measured in clinical practice among the hypertension centers of the Italian Society of Hypertension in comparison to what is recommend by the latest guidelines.
methodsCoordinators of hypertension centers affiliated to the Italian Society of Hypertension were invited by email to complete an online survey including 26 questions regarding the equipment (devices and cuffs) available in the centers, office BP measurement procedure and possible additional measures performed by the devices.
resultsWe obtained answers from 72 of the 119 centers (response rate 60.5%). The majority of the responders were older than 55 years (55.5%) and were from the North of Italy (61.1%). 95.6% stated the use of a validated device: 65.3% used automatic oscillometric devices, 27.8% an aneroid device, while 6.9% a manual device with a digital column. Unattended BP measurements were performed in 1.4% of the cases. Normal size cuff was available among 97.2% and large cuff among 83.1% of the centers. The majority tested BP in two different positions supine or sitting and standing positions, but there was a quarter of centers that measured BP only in one position. 38% of the responders performed three BP recordings, 38% at least two, but 5.7% measured BP only once. 42.3% of the devices used were able to detect atrial fibrillation.
conclusionOur survey depicted a considerable heterogeneity of office BP measurement methodology in daily practice, not always aligned with current guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41436697What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.