Evidence mapPaperPMID 41436713Full record

ReviewStem cell reviews and reports2026

The Broken Cradle: Bone Marrow Stem Cell Niche Remodelling in Diabetes.

Jina J Y Kum, Christopher J Howlett, Zia A Khan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jina J Y KumPathology and Laboratory Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, N6A 5C1, Canada.
Christopher J HowlettPathology and Laboratory Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, N6A 5C1, Canada.
Zia A KhanPathology and Laboratory Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, N6A 5C1, Canada. zia.khan@schulich.uwo.ca.

Funding

Diabetes Canada OG-3-13-4034-ZKNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2021-03322
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic hyperglycemia in diabetes precipitates vascular damage and subsequent organ failure, yet the most critical defect is the inability to mount an adequate regenerative response. Numerous studies confirm that the reparative process, particularly angiogenesis, is profoundly defective in patients with diabetes. An increasingly vital area of investigation focuses on vasculogenesis: the de novo formation of blood vessels, involving specialized stem/progenitor cells. When these crucial repair cells and processes fail, complications in the target organ become inevitable and often irreversible. This review synthesizes our current understanding of how the complex diabetic milieu, marked by inflammation and metabolic stress, fundamentally corrupts the function, mobilization, and survival of these essential vascular regenerative populations. We highlight the known molecular mechanisms underlying this failure and, critically, examine emerging strategies to normalize these cellular abnormalities. Restoring robust vasculogenesis represents the next frontier in therapeutic development, holding the key to enhancing endogenous repair and successfully engineering new, functional vasculature to combat diabetic tissue damage.

Indexed as

Bone Marrow CellsDiabetes MellitusStem Cell NicheAnimalsHumansNeovascularization, PhysiologicBone marrowDiabetesDiabetic complicationsEndothelial cellsHematopoietic stem cellsMesodermal stem cellsProgenitor cellsVascular regenerationVasculogenesis

Identifiers

PMID41436713
PMCPMC12858563

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.