ArticleScientific reports2025
Multimodal inverse kinematics significantly improves IMU-based biomechanical analyses.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- IMU- and Vision-Based Measurement Techniques for Joint Kinematics: A Narrative Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In musculoskeletal simulations, IMU-based approaches are often compromised by errors such as joint angle drift and offset errors due to calibration inaccuracies. These errors can compromise the accuracy of both kinematic and dynamic outcomes. This study presents a simulation-based investigation that uses synthetic inertial and positional data to systematically assess the potential of integrating spatial reference information into IMU-driven inverse kinematics analyses. Optical motion capture data was captured and error-free kinematic and dynamic data was created based on the optical motion capture data. The error-free data was then used as a reference. Based on this reference data, synthetic orientation and position data was created, incorporating a range of error types and magnitudes (e.g., sensor noise, drift, misalignment). To create the IMU-based analysis results, we calculated relative quaternions based on the orientation data which were then converted into Euler angles. We then conducted a sensitivity analysis to determine the spatial accuracy required in the position data to effectively compensate for typical IMU errors. Across all error types and magnitudes, the multimodal inverse approach (using both synthetic IMU and positional data) yielded significantly more accurate results than solely IMU-based analyses. Specifically, the mean joint angle RMSE decreased by [Formula: see text], the mean joint torque RMSE by [Formula: see text], the mean residual force RMSE by [Formula: see text], and the mean residual torque RMSE by [Formula: see text]. Future research will evaluate the effectiveness of the multimodal inverse kinematics approach when applied to real-world measurement data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.