ArticleBMC nephrology2025
Risk and prognosis of Omicron infection in home-based dialysis patients: a retrospective cohort study in China.
Article in BMC nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHome-based dialysis, including peritoneal dialysis (PD) and home hemodialysis (HHD), has been suggested to reduce SARS-CoV-2 infection rates and improve outcomes compared to in-center dialysis, yet evidence from China remains scarce.
objectiveTo investigate the risk and prognosis of Omicron infection among patients receiving home-based dialysis versus in-center dialysis during the Omicron surge in Shanghai, China.
methodsThis single-center retrospective cohort study included patients undergoing maintenance dialysis (home-based dialysis or in-center dialysis) at Ren Ji Hospital from December 1, 2022, to January 31, 2023. The primary endpoint was Omicron infection rate; secondary endpoints included infection timeline, all-cause mortality, and associated risk factors. Logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors.
resultsA total of 465 patients were included: 267 in the home-based dialysis group (263 PD, 4 HHD) and 198 in the in-center dialysis group. The infection rate was significantly lower in the home-based dialysis group than in the in-center dialysis group (52.1% vs. 88.4%, P < .001). Home-based dialysis was an independent protective factor against infection. No significant difference was found in all-cause mortality between home-based dialysis and in-center dialysis groups (5.2% vs. 7.6%, P = .304). Advanced age, heart failure, and low serum albumin were associated with increased risk of death following infection.
conclusionsHome-based dialysis significantly reduced the risk of Omicron infection without adversely affecting survival outcomes. Expanding home-based dialysis may have public health implications for dialysis care during future pandemics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.