ArticleCritical care (London, England)2025
Monitoring diaphragmatic effort during diaphragm neurostimulation-assisted ventilation.
Article in Critical care (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Targeting the diaphragm during weaning from mechanical ventilation.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationaleDiaphragm neurostimulation-assisted ventilation (DNAV) can improve cardiopulmonary function during passive mechanical ventilation. However, this technique requires a reliable method to monitor and titrate diaphragmatic loading to avoid both insufficient and excessive diaphragmatic stimulation.
objectiveTo establish whether the reduction in airway pressure-time product (ΔPTPaw) obtained during diaphragm neurostimulation in assist control volume-controlled mode accurately quantifies the magnitude of respiratory muscle effort elicited by neurostimulation.
methodsThis was a secondary analysis of the STIMULUS trial. Diaphragm neurostimulation was titrated across four levels targeting progressive occlusion pressures of 0, - 5, - 10, and - 15 cm H₂O at two PEEP levels. At each level, airway, esophageal, and gastric pressures were recorded to compute transdiaphragmatic pressure-time product (PTPdi), respiratory muscles pressure-time product (PTPmus), and ΔPTPaw, defined as the difference in airway pressure-time product between non-stimulated and stimulated breaths. Linear mixed-effects models, Bland-Altman analyses, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess agreement and discriminative ability. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
resultsTwelve patients contributed 494 high-quality respiratory cycles (63% of recorded cycles). Valid Pdi data were available in nine patients. Increasing neurostimulation was associated with higher PTPdi and PTPmus and a corresponding reduction in PTPaw. ΔPTPaw was correlated with both PTPdi (R² = 0.82) and PTPmus (R² = 0.92), with good agreement observed (limits: - 4 to 44 cm H₂O·s/min for PTPdi, and - 5 to 39 cm H₂O·s/min for PTPmus). ΔPTPaw demonstrated excellent discrimination for inadequate (area under receiver operating characteristic curve, AUROC ≥ 0.94) and excessive (AUROC ≥ 0.86) diaphragmatic effort.
conclusionsΔPTPaw is a reliable, non-invasive surrogate for monitoring diaphragm loading during DNAV under assist-controlled volume-controlled mode and may guide neurostimulation titration in mechanically ventilated patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.