ReviewCell transplantation
A narrative review of vascular conduits for coronary artery bypass grafting.
Review in Cell transplantation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Barriers to clinical translation of small-diameter tissue-engineered vascular grafts in peripheral reconstruction.JVS-vascular science · 2026Review
- Advancements in nanomaterials for the treatment and management of vascular surgeries: from drug delivery to biomedical implants.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Tissue-engineered blood vessels for clinical translation: Design logic, representative advances and persistent barriers.Journal of tissue engineeringReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) involves creating new conduits to restore blood flow to the heart. Using autologous vascular grafts presents challenges, including infection risk after vein harvesting, and scarcity of viable vein tissue. Researchers are exploring tissue-engineered vascular grafts (TEVGs), aiming to create optimal small-diameter vascular graft (SDVG) (<6 mm) for CABG surgery. TEVGs with suitable long-term patency could offer a promising alternative, potentially reduce patient morbidity and improve surgical outcomes. However, no SDVG is commercially available for CABG surgery in Europe, and no new clinical trials of coronary TEVGs have been reported since 2018. This narrative review summarizes the development and use of SDVG (<6 mm) for CABG, focusing on TEVGs and cell-seeding strategies. We outline the main types of grafts tested in preclinical and early clinical studies and highlight how different cell sources and seeding approaches aim to enhance graft functionality, patency, and long-term outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.