ArticleAcademic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine2026
Global Emergency Medicine: A Scoping Review of the Literature From 2024.
Article in Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Authorship and citation inequities in high-impact emergency medicine journals: a bibliometric analysis.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2026Article
- Global Emergency Medicine: A Scoping Review of the Literature From 2024.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe Global Emergency Medicine Literature Review (GEMLR) identifies impactful research in global emergency care. This 20th annual edition reviews GEM literature published in 2024 and highlights the growth of GEMLR over the years.
methodsWe conducted a scoping review of 2024 GEM articles through structured PubMed and gray literature searches. Reviewers and editors from 10 countries screened abstracts using predefined criteria for three domains: disaster and humanitarian response (DHR), emergency care in limited-resource settings (ECLRS), and emergency medicine development (EMD). Duplicates and articles lacking authorship equity or ethical oversight were excluded. Remaining publications were scored using tailored rubrics for original research (OR), review articles (RE), and gray literature (GRAY). The top 5% in each category were selected for critical appraisal. A retrospective summary of 20 years of GEMLR reviews was also completed.
resultsThe search identified 46,714 PubMed and 12,575 gray literature articles. A total of 473 met inclusion criteria and were scored; 33 were selected as the top 5%, a decrease from 55 in 2023. Although the search string was unchanged, 2024 yielded ~10,000 fewer articles. Common themes included trauma, pediatrics, and clinical/triage protocols, with a new focus on mental health among clinicians and disaster victims. Over 20 years, 230 individuals have contributed 810 service-years to GEMLR. Nearly 75% of members were from the USA, while 32 (13.9%) were from LMICs and 27 (11.7%) from non-USA high-income countries. In total, 398,904 articles have been screened, 8476 scored, and 517 top articles narratively reviewed since 2005.
conclusionsOver two decades, GEMLR has evolved into a large-scale, multinational, methodologically rigorous initiative, highlighting more than 500 high-impact GEM publications. In 2024, despite fewer articles screened, 33 top studies were identified across key domains. GEMLR emphasizes equitable LMIC representation, rigorous quality standards, and authorship equity, aiming to help shape the future of emergency care research.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.