Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41437636›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026

Reconstructing and comparing signal transduction networks from single-cell protein quantification data.

Tim Stohn, Roderick A P M van Eijl, Klaas W Mulder, Lodewyk F A Wessels, Evert Bosdriesz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tim StohnDepartment of Computer Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1081 HV, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4791-9199
Roderick A P M van EijlDepartment of Molecular Developmental Biology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University, Nijmegen, 6500 GL, The Netherlands.
Klaas W MulderDepartment of Molecular Developmental Biology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University, Nijmegen, 6500 GL, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8516-4458
Lodewyk F A WesselsDivision of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, 1066 CX, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1656-6995
Evert BosdrieszDepartment of Computer Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1081 HV, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8788-9548

Funding

Dutch Cancer SocietyNKIWessels group by the Oncode Institute and Institutional
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationSignal transduction networks regulate many essential biological processes and are frequently aberrated in diseases such as cancer. A mechanistic understanding of such networks, and how they differ between cell populations, is essential to design effective treatment strategies. Typically, such networks are computationally reconstructed based on systematic perturbation experiments, followed by quantification of signaling protein activity. Recent technological advances now allow for the quantification of the activity of many (signaling) proteins simultaneously in single cells. This makes it feasible to reconstruct or quantify signaling networks without performing systematic perturbations.

resultsHere, we introduce single-cell modular response analysis (scMRA) and single-cell comparative network reconstruction (scCNR) to derive signal transduction networks by exploiting the heterogeneity of single-cell (phospho-)protein measurements. The methods treat stochastic variation in total protein abundances as natural perturbation experiments, whose effects propagate through the network and hence facilitate the reconstruction and quantification of the underlying signaling network. scCNR reconstructs cell population-specific networks, where cells from different populations have the same underlying topology, but the interaction strengths can differ between populations. We extensively validated scMRA and scCNR on simulated data, and applied it to unpublished data of (phospho-)protein measurements of EGFR-inhibitor-treated keratinocytes to recover signaling differences downstream of EGFR. scCNR will help to unravel the mechanistic signaling differences between cell populations, and will subsequently guide the development of well-informed treatment strategies. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The code used for scCNR in this study has been deposited on Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17600937 and is also available as a Python module at https://github.com/ibivu/scmra. Additionally, data and code to reproduce all figures is available at https://github.com/tstohn/scmra_analysis.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyProteinsSignal TransductionSingle-Cell AnalysisAlgorithmsErbB ReceptorsHumansErbB ReceptorsProteins

Identifiers

PMID41437636
PMCPMC12797212

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.