ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics2025
Repair of critical bone defects with two bioceramics in rat calvaria.
Article in Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bioceramics exhibit sealing, biomineralization, and tissue neoformation induction properties, making them promising alternatives for tissue regeneration in bone defects. Objective: Evaluate the repair of critical bone defects in rat calvaria using MTA Repair HP and Biodentine compared to White MTA and a control group. Materials and Methods: Two defects measuring 5 mm in diameter and approximately 1.5 mm in depth were created in the calvaria of 20 rats, followed by the application of the studied materials. After sample collection, histological slides were prepared and stained with hematoxylin and eosin for the evaluation of inflammatory infiltration, vasodilation, and bone repair capacity. Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), with variable comparisons conducted through Fisher's exact test and the Kruskal-Wallis test, considering a significance level of 5% ( Results: Biodentine and MTA HP exhibited favorable biological properties over 30 days, promoting the neoformation of mineralized tissue. After this period, White MTA demonstrated lower inflammation levels compared to Biodentine and MTA HP. Conclusion: Both materials induced the neoformation of mineralized tissue in critical bone defects in the rat calvaria over the 30 day evaluation period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.