Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41438524›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2026

Coronary artery surgery outcome differences by sex.

Selma Rizvanovic, Melanie Arnreiter, Alissa Florian, Sigrid Sandner

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Selma RizvanovicDepartment of Cardiac and Thoracic Aortic Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Melanie ArnreiterDepartment of Cardiac and Thoracic Aortic Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Alissa FlorianDepartment of Cardiac and Thoracic Aortic Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Sigrid SandnerDepartment of Cardiac and Thoracic Aortic Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-4669-9841

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease remains the leading global cause of death, with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) serving as the gold standard for managing complex coronary artery disease. Despite advancements in surgical techniques and perioperative care, women undergoing CABG continue to face poorer outcomes compared to men, including higher operative and long-term mortality, greater rates of graft failure, and an increased incidence of postoperative complications such as stroke and sternal wound infections. Women also exhibit higher readmission rates, worse recovery trajectories, and lower quality of life after surgery. The underlying factors contributing to these disparities are multifactorial. Women typically present with advanced age, a higher burden of cardiovascular risk factors, and smaller coronary artery and graft diameters, all of which pose technical challenges and may reduce graft patency. Additionally, socioeconomic barriers, delayed diagnoses due to atypical symptom presentation, and lower utilization of evidence-based secondary prevention strategies widen the outcome gap. Efforts to address these disparities must include greater representation of women in clinical trials, as well as designing trials dedicated to women, as emphasized by the Randomized Comparison of the Clinical Outcome of Single vs Multiple Arterial Grafts: Women (ROMA: Women) and Revascularization Choices Among Under-Represented Groups Evaluation (RECHARGE) trials. Future strategies should prioritize personalized cardiac care, optimize surgical approaches tailored to sex-specific anatomy, and strengthen secondary prevention adherence in women.

Indexed as

Coronary artery bypass graftingSex differencesWomen

Identifiers

PMID41438524
PMCPMC12719376

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.