ArticleCardiovascular therapeutics2025
Association Between the Naples Score and Recurrence in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation.
Article in Cardiovascular therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Association Between the Naples Score and Recurrence in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation.Cardiovascular therapeutics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To explore the relationship between the Naples Score and the recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) following radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) in patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 719 patients with AF who underwent radiofrequency catheter RFCA between April 2019 and October 2024 at Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University. We utilized Cox multifactorial regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival curves to evaluate the relationship between the Naples Score and the recurrence of AF following RFCA. Additionally, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was generated to assess the predictive value of the Naples Score for recurrence. Results: After follow-up, 156 (21.7%) AF patients occurred recurrence. A significant difference in recurrence rates was observed among patients with varying Naples Scores (14.0% vs. 20.8% vs. 34.2%, Conclusion: Naples Score was identified as an independent risk factor for recurrence following RFCA of AF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.